Pricing - PSM
The assumption underlying PSM is that
respondents are capable of envisioning a pricing
landscape and that price is an intrinsic measure
of value or utility. Participants in a PSM
exercise are asked to identify price points at
which they can infer a particular value to the
product or service under study. PSM claims to
capture the extent to which a product has an
inherent value denoted by price. The traditional
PSM approach asks four price-related questions,
which are then evaluated as a series of four
cumulative distributions, one distribution for
each question. The standard question formats can
vary, but generally take the following form:
At what price would you consider the product to
be so expensive that you would not consider
buying it? (Too expensive)
At what price would you consider the product to
be priced so low that you would feel the quality
couldn¨t be very good? (Too cheap)
At what price would you consider the product
starting to get expensive, so that it is not out
of the question, but you would have to give some
thought to buying it? (Expensive/High Side)
At what price would you consider the product to
be a bargain!a great buy for the money?
(Cheap/Good Value)
Pricing - Gabor Grange
Gabor-Granger pricing research is named after
the economists who invented it in the 1960s.
Customers are asked to complete a survey where
they are asked to say if they would buy a
product at a particular price. The price is
changed and respondents again say if they would
buy or not. From the results we can work out
what the optimum price is for each individual.
By taking a sample of customers we can work out
what levels of demand would be expected at each
price point across the market as a whole (the
demand curve in the following graph). Using this
estimate of demand, the price elasticity (or
expected revenue) can be calculated and so the
optimum price-point in the market established.
Note that a revenue optimum may be different
from a profit optimum. The ability to model
dynamically is extremely valuable in pricing
studies.
A
weakness of Gabor Granger is that customers may
understate the price they will pay (there are
also circumstances in which they will overstate
the price). Consequently the phrasing of the
"would you buy" question is extremely important
as are other contextual questions to place the
customer in the buying frame of mind. Typically,
Gabor Granger is only used when considering on
product in isolation, whereas in real life they
would face a choice about which product to buy.
Pricing - BPTO
For brand specific studies measures of brand
equity and category management
Brand Price Trade-off Studies (BPTO)
can be used. Here customers evaluate a range of
products and prices are adjusted until customers
stop purchasing.
For some markets where prices are very visible,
or where there is a large amount of internal
pricing data, it is possible to use econometric
methods to examine the impact of price and to
understand price elasticity. Using pricing
tests, discounts and advanced statistical
analysis the impact of price can be assessed
live in the real world.
The most common approach to pricing research is
to rely on market intelligence and
follow-my-leader type pricing using a competitor
as a benchmark. However a me-too approach leads
to high levels of competition, and it is
important to consider the strategic impact of
pricing as well as the short tem sales impact.
Some caution is needed when conducting pricing
studies. Statistically speaking, where you are
looking to optimize prices where you are looking
at relatively small price changes of 5-10%, you
will need larger than normal sample sizes to get
the statistical accuracy you need. For many
companies this can make pricing research
expensive, unless combined with a range of other
measurement.
|